Immediately after US President Donald Trump announced with great joy that the United Arab Emirates and the Israeli occupation state had reached a “historic” agreement to normalize relations between them, the Palestinians took to the streets in protest against the Emirati move, which they considered a “liquidation of the Palestinian cause,” the historical icon of the Arab struggle. The UAE failed to justify its alliance with the Zionist enemy under the pretext of halting projects to annex Palestinian lands, and the statements of Zionist officials undermined all Emirati claims. Those who closely follow this relationship realize that Abu Dhabi promoted with all its might to fabricate positives for its action, especially with the support and support that appears to have been given in advance from some Gulf countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, which are accused of their intentions to follow the Emirati approach in dealing with Israel. There is no doubt that the majority of the Arab peoples categorically reject normalization with the Zionist enemy, and despite all the pressure exerted against some Arab peoples by their governments, specifically in the Gulf region, popular campaigns rejecting “Emirati treason” were launched across social media sites, calling for the support of Palestine, holding the traitors accountable, and denounced normalization as a direct surrender to the Zionist enemy, as the people see that the Emirati alliance – Zionism represents a threat to the future of Palestine, its land and its people. Palestinian presidential spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeinah confirmed in a statement that the agreement “undermined the Arab peace initiative,” and is “a betrayal of Jerusalem, Al-Aqsa, the decisions of the Arab and Islamic summits, and international legitimacy, and an aggression against the Palestinian people,” while the leader of the Palestinian National Liberation Movement, Abbas Zaki, said that the agreement is considered “an abandonment by the UAE of its national, religious, and humanitarian duty toward the Palestinian cause.” The Hamas movement said through its spokesman, “Hazem Qassem,” that “this agreement is rejected and condemned and does not serve the Palestinian cause, and is a continuation of the denial of the rights of the Palestinian people.” Qassem added that the agreement is “a free reward for the Israeli occupation for its crimes,” and “encourages the occupation to commit more massacres.” For its part, the Islamic Jihad movement expressed its denunciation of the normalization agreement between the UAE and the Israeli occupation, and the movement’s spokesman, Daoud Shehab, considered the agreement a departure from the national consensus, It legitimizes the occupation and saves the Israeli government from its predicament and crises. The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that history and the conscience of the peoples of the region will not forget and will not forgive the UAE for what it described as hypocritical behavior in concluding a full normalization agreement with Israel, adding that the Palestinians have the right to express a strong reaction. On this agreement. In a statement, the Turkish Foreign Ministry expressed its concern about the UAE’s attempt to cancel the Arab peace plan drawn up by the Arab League in 2002 and supported by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Iran described the agreement as a “dangerous and illegitimate step.” A statement by the Iranian Foreign Ministry said that Abu Dhabi’s normalization of its relations with Israel is a strategic mistake, and will only lead to strengthening the axis of resistance. The Iranian Foreign Ministry also condemned the normalization of diplomatic relations between the UAE and the Israeli entity, considering that the result of these relations will be to strengthen the axis and role of resistance in the region. The Iranian Foreign Ministry considered this step to be “strategic folly” by Abu Dhabi and Tel Aviv, and its result will be to strengthen the axis of resistance, stressing that “the Palestinian people The free peoples of the world will not tolerate the normalizing countries of the usurping entity or its crimes.” The Ennahda Movement party, the largest political force in Tunisia, strongly condemned the UAE normalization agreement with Israel, and considered it “a blatant attack on the rights of the Palestinian people and a departure from the official and popular Arab and Islamic consensus and a stand with Zionist settler colonialism.” The party affirmed in a statement its “support and solidarity with the Palestinian people and their national forces that unanimously condemned this Emirati position and considered it an aggression against the Palestinian people and every freedom-loving person.” Seven Kuwaiti political forces and blocs announced their absolute rejection of the UAE’s normalization with the Zionist entity, noting that the normalization projects with the Zionist entity are a continuation of the practical implementation of the terms of the deal of shame called the Deal of the Century. She added, “The announcement by one of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (the UAE) of its recognition of the usurping Zionist entity and its intention to establish full relations came without justification or benefit to this country or to the Arab and Islamic nation.” The Moroccan “Unification and Reform” movement strongly condemned the decision to normalize relations between the UAE and Israel, which was announced. “Unification and Reform” said in a statement published by it, “We announce our strong condemnation of this humiliating normalization step taken by officials of the United Arab Emirates.” The movement considered the agreement between officials of the United Arab Emirates and Israel rejected, and also considered it “a betrayal and a stab in the back of the resistant Palestinian people, and our failure of the Arab consensus in its unified position against the Zionist occupation.” A member of the Presidential Council of the Libyan government, Mohamed Amari Zayed, also considered that the Israeli-Emirati normalization agreement represents “an unsurprising betrayal by the Emirates,” and added: It also represents “another stab in the back of the nation from the Emirates, whose policies have become victims of the peoples of the nation in the last decade, Many times the number of people killed and displaced by the Zionist entity in fifty years.” The leader of the State of Law coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, announced his rejection of all forms of normalization with Israel, noting that the UAE’s “normalization” of its relations with Tel Aviv is a “clear violation” of the decisions of the Arab League, and a return to establishing what he described as a “plan of humiliation and humiliation.” In Bahrain, Bahraini political associations confirmed their rejection and denunciation of all forms of normalization with Israel, in accordance with the position. The associations said in a statement signed by eight associations, the day before yesterday, that “the evidence of history confirms to everyone a clear fact, which is that all steps and directions to recognize the occupying state and communicate with it or attempt to conclude bilateral deals, have always increased this state’s aggression and arrogance towards the Palestinian people, and the Zionists’ greed to strengthen their control over the Palestinian land.” The International Union of Muslim Scholars also denounced the agreement to normalize relations between the UAE and “Israel,” and described it as “high treason.” The Union said in a statement that the agreement between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed is “a high betrayal and a major reward for the crimes of the Zionist occupiers in Holy Jerusalem and against the Palestinians.” It added that the agreement, which included “Israel’s” suspension, included parts of the West Bank as an implicit recognition of Israel’s right to extend its sovereignty over the occupied West Bank. Algerian parties strongly condemned the normalization agreement that the UAE signed with “Israel,” and considered it “Treason” and “a stab in the back of the Palestinian cause.” She strongly denounced the signing of the “normalization agreement,” describing it as “a stab in the back of the Palestinian cause and a complete treachery.” She stressed in a statement, “Linking this ill-fated agreement to the delusional success in postponing the annexation plan for some Palestinian lands cannot deceive anyone, and does not justify this position, which will be recorded in the pages of doom and relapse,” pointing out that “it will remain a disgrace that haunts its owners throughout history.” The Algerian parties also denounced “the silence of the various actors in the Arab arena, even though this agreement is considered a violation of the Arab Peace Initiative, which requires the normalization of relations.” With the complete withdrawal of the Israeli entity from the territories occupied since 1967, which was undermined by the UAE’s single declaration,” according to the same statement, stressing that “the decision taken by the UAE in full and open coordination with the head of the Zionist entity and the President of the United States of America reveals and outlines an old trend of the rulers of this country.” She stressed that “the decision of the normalization agreement would support arrogance.” “And Israeli injustice, and it cannot in any way stop Israeli settlement, as the normalizers claim to justify their shameful position, but rather strengthens the position of the owners of the Zionist expansionist project.” Luxembourg’s Foreign Minister, Jean Asselborn, expressed his doubts that the normalization agreement between Israel and the Emirates would bring stability to the region, describing Abu Dhabi’s position as “a letdown to its Arab brothers.” Asselborn reported that the aforementioned agreement had not been concluded within two months, indicating that this rapprochement was Noticeable over the past two or three years.
